One simple argument ..

As we come up to the trail date, which will be announced over the next few days .. I wanted to break this case down to it's simplest argument.

Basically this lawsuit boils down to two important documents.

An email sent to Tricia on April 24, 2011 [here] .. stating that Tricia was entitled to draw a salary of up to $3000 per month including expenses already paid for Websleuths LLC.

Then the legal contract for Websleuths LCC signed on May 1, 2011 [here]

If the email sent to Tricia which pre-dates the contract by only 7 days is deemed to be enough for Tricia to believe she was within her rights to withdraw monies from the LLC account, then Tricia wins. If the contract omitting the agreement is deemed to override that email is enough to cancel that arrangement Sue does.

Everything else comes down to intent, and intent may be what ultimately leads the jury to decide between the email and the contract above.

The jury may decide that even though the contract is a weightier document than the email, that the fact that it was drawn up by Sue's husband and they may have deliberately left out the important disclaimer when it came to managerial income. Apart from that there is ample evidence of other mis-doings on the part of Sue Pruitt, so we shall have to be patient and see.

It all depends on what is presented in court and the final decision shall be up to the jury, we shall try to keep you as up to date as possible.

P.S. If anyone is attending the trial and has a twitter account and would be willing to do live updates please let us know below and include your twitter account and tweet to #WebsleuthsLawsuit