Beached az!!

Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended No-Evidence and Traditional Motions for Partial Summary Judgement

Reading through the latest documents a couple of things really stood out to me in this document. Starting here:

Thus it is not a STRETCH for any reasonable mind to determine that the Defendant PREYED on her VICTIMS and then sought and obtained money from these victims / members of the Websleuths.com website. 

Oh no, it is indeed a GIANT LEAP. To go from complaining about money issues and taking money for Ad Free, to saying she used Websleuths as her grooming ground is a HUGE STRETCH. Especially when so many affidavits filed at the same time do nothing but complain that Tricia was largely MIA from the forum, so when prey, did all this grooming take place? 

The Great Clay Davis you say? Well .. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeit!!